{"id":29583,"date":"2025-01-28T15:17:59","date_gmt":"2025-01-28T15:17:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/mw3-players-claim-new-skin-is-the-most-pay-to-lose-in-cod-history-dexerto\/"},"modified":"2025-01-28T15:17:59","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T15:17:59","slug":"mw3-players-claim-new-skin-is-the-most-pay-to-lose-in-cod-history-dexerto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/mw3-players-claim-new-skin-is-the-most-pay-to-lose-in-cod-history-dexerto\/","title":{"rendered":"MW3 players claim new skin is the most \u201cpay to lose\u201d in CoD history &#8211; Dexerto"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>MW3 players claim new skin is the most \u201cpay to lose\u201d in CoD history ActivisionThe Sketched Out operator bundle in MW3 has been a target for many reasons since it launched. Now, players are labeling it the most \u201cpay to lose\u201d skin in CoD\u2019s history. Since Modern Warfare 2019, the approach to in-game cosmetics in CoD has shifted drastically. Each new entry pushes the boundaries, with crossovers with popular brands and new imaginative creations. The shift in strategy has been, with many players wanting a more realistic cosmetic approach versus playing as Godzilla or overly colorful characters. The Sketched Out pack has been a target of criticism since it hit MW3 in early February before Season 2 arrived, and as time goes on, the criticism rises with fans deeming it the most \u201cpay to lose\u201d skin ever. MW3\u2019s Sketched Out bundle divides players The Sketched Out pack is in MW3 and Warzone\u2019s store for 2400 COD Points, and it brings a unique comic book aesthetic to CoD. It\u2019s been blasted by players for looking like a Fortnite skin, and it\u2019s also raised plenty of visibility concerns. Some have called it a giant \u201cneon sign\u201d that gives away your location. In a post shared to the MW3 subreddit, one MW3 player addressed those visibility concerns. \u201cI\u2019m so glad this guy picked the bright comic book skin,\u201d they said. \u201cIt made him super easy to kill,\u201d as they lay prone on Shipment looking at the helpless player. Other players chimed in on the skin\u2019s zany appearance: \u201cPay to lose.\u201d Another added on to the previous sentiment by stating: \u201cIt\u2019s the most pay to lose skin in the game.\u201d Funnily enough, plenty of players showed support for the skin. \u201cI f**king love this skin. Got that cell-shaded look that I like,\u201d one player said. Another replied: \u201cLove this skin. It\u2019s the only one I\u2019ve ever bought from the store. I\u2019ve been using it the last few weeks.\u201d As mentioned, skins like these typically see the player base revisit the visibility concern, which is a fair concern after the Roze and Gaia skins ran rampant in their respective titles. One player shared their take: \u201cI\u2019ve never really had an easier or harder time to see and hit enemies regarding their skin.\u201d Counter to that, one user mentioned the Gaia skin that got nerfed specifically because of visibility issues, saying they much prefer this to not being able to see their enemy at all. \u201cI prefer this over that groot bullsh*t campers use,\u201d they claimed. Either way, it seems that some people are ok with being a bit easier to see and paying to lose if it means running around the map in style.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MW3 players claim new skin is the most \u201cpay to lose\u201d in CoD history ActivisionThe Sketched Out operator bundle in MW3 has been a target for many reasons since it launched. Now, players are labeling it the most \u201cpay to lose\u201d skin in CoD\u2019s history. Since Modern Warfare 2019, the approach to in-game cosmetics in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29583","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29583","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29583"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29583\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29583"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29583"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29583"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}