{"id":33306,"date":"2025-01-28T15:40:08","date_gmt":"2025-01-28T15:40:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/warzone-fans-argue-that-black-ops-cold-wars-guns-should-be-removed-dexerto\/"},"modified":"2025-01-28T15:40:08","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T15:40:08","slug":"warzone-fans-argue-that-black-ops-cold-wars-guns-should-be-removed-dexerto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/warzone-fans-argue-that-black-ops-cold-wars-guns-should-be-removed-dexerto\/","title":{"rendered":"Warzone fans argue that Black Ops Cold War\u2019s guns should be removed &#8211; Dexerto"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Warzone fans argue that Black Ops Cold War\u2019s guns should be removed Freepik, @drobotdean \/ ActivisionCall of Duty: Warzone\u2019s fans are reacting to weeks of meta concerns and bugs by engaging in a large, heated debate about repealing Black Ops Cold War\u2019s integration and removing all BOCW guns from Verdansk. An active community is a talkative community and, at the very least, Warzone can certainly appreciate a fanbase that has\u2026 a lot to say. Across social media, the CoD battle royale\u2019s players have ramped up discourse in the weeks since Treyarch and Raven Software\u2019s BOCW integrated with Infinity Ward\u2019s Modern Warfare-based Warzone. Now, following surges on Twitter, and a Reddit thread with hundreds of comments and thousands of upvotes\/downvotes alike, concerned fans have keyed in on one prominent suggestion: to repeal integration and remove BOCW\u2019s guns entirely. While this idea may not be realistic one, it embodies a period of frustration with numerous bugs and overpowered gun concerns after their inclusion. As such, the heated argument has found moments of nuance beneath the generally reductionist sentiment. A meme shared across both Warzone subreddits proffers a simple solution to help the battle royale return to its glory days: \u201cRepeal and replace the Cold War integration.\u201d With thousands of upvotes and hundreds of comments, it appears that weeks of stim-glitch abuse, invisibility bugs and, more importantly, Cold War weapon superiority have truly made an impact on the game\u2019s most active fans. While many commenters do echo the concern, some noting that they \u201cliked Warzone before the Cold War integration,\u201d others have been more accommodating to developers\u2019 efforts. Numerous fans have gone against the post\u2019s grain, arguing that integration is a good thing and that properly balancing the arsenal should be the goal \u2014 not outright removing everything. At the heart of controversy is the DMR 14, which has dominated the meta alongside the MAC-10 and dual Diamattis within a few days of BOCW Season 1. Now, numerous updates later, all three guns (as well as the lurking Type 63) have all been nerfed twice \u2014 meaning the meta is much more flexible. It remains to be seen if these adjustments will be enough to satiate Warzone\u2019s fans, but they\u2019re, at the very least, a step in the right direction. While perfect balance is as unlikely possibility as Activision fully repealing their new game\u2019s content, there is some middle ground to find in Verdansk.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Warzone fans argue that Black Ops Cold War\u2019s guns should be removed Freepik, @drobotdean \/ ActivisionCall of Duty: Warzone\u2019s fans are reacting to weeks of meta concerns and bugs by engaging in a large, heated debate about repealing Black Ops Cold War\u2019s integration and removing all BOCW guns from Verdansk. An active community is a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33306","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33306","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33306"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33306\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}