{"id":34381,"date":"2025-01-28T15:46:51","date_gmt":"2025-01-28T15:46:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/warzone-slammed-for-pay-to-win-blueprint-making-mac-10-loadout-even-more-op-dexerto\/"},"modified":"2025-01-28T15:46:51","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T15:46:51","slug":"warzone-slammed-for-pay-to-win-blueprint-making-mac-10-loadout-even-more-op-dexerto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/warzone-slammed-for-pay-to-win-blueprint-making-mac-10-loadout-even-more-op-dexerto\/","title":{"rendered":"Warzone slammed for \u201cpay to win\u201d blueprint making Mac 10 loadout even more OP &#8211; Dexerto"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Warzone slammed for \u201cpay to win\u201d blueprint making Mac 10 loadout even more OP ActivisionCall of Duty: Warzone has been accused of being pay-to-win after the Gallantry blueprint for the Mac 10, which is a part of the battle pass, is seemingly stronger than the base weapon. Just like every other successful battle royale on the market, Warzone has been kept fresh with multiple updates since it launched. Be it map changes, new skins, extra cosmetics, and even challenges, Warzone has had it all. These additions, though, haven\u2019t come with controversy. The meta changes each time a weapon like the DMR or Bruen comes to the forefront \u2013 with players trying to get an upper hand in any way possible. The Mac10 is one of the weapons that has shaped the current meta, but, after discovered that the Gallantry blueprint of the weapon is actually a buff compared to the base version, some have called the game pay-to-win. Twitch and YouTube star NICKMERCS called out the weapon as pay to win in his latest YouTube upload, saying it\u2019s not a good look for the Warzone developers. \u201cI love my Mac 10 and I have a lot of fun using it in Verdansk right now, and I totally cool with them not touching this thing, but, it probably does need to get fixed,\u201d he said. \u201cAt the end of the day, pay to win is not going to be a good look. You don\u2019t want to force people to cough up their cash to be able to play at a higher level. That\u2019s just not it man,\u201d Nick added, before defending the devs. \u201cNow it\u2019s obviously just a mistake, I\u2019m sure they didn\u2019t mean to do this, they might have \u2013 I don\u2019t know \u2013 but I don\u2019t think they did. It\u2019ll probably get fixed soon.\u201d Other players have called it out too. \u201cShame on you. CW integration is a mess. You integrate skins pay to win on Mac10 and your DMR\u2019s patch is a joke,\u201d tweeted one fan. \u201cNerf DMR and fix the problem about the battle pass blueprint of [the] Mac10 or maybe the game has been changed to pay to win????\u201d added another. @RavenSoftware hey guys shame on you\u2026 CW integration is a mess. You integrate skins pay to win on Mac10 and your DMR&#8217;s patch is a joke. Nice job f*cking Warzone. \u2014 DaNiKa (@TenientePorkayo) January 7, 2021 https:\/\/twitter.com\/Luis_Alvarado_B\/status\/1347710979602309123 Previously, players called out the Bruen and Grau as pay to win weapons, but that was a little different seeing as that was just about the base versions. If it is a mistake, as NICKMERCS points out, then the problem should be fixed sooner rather than later, but we\u2019ll just have to wait and see.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Warzone slammed for \u201cpay to win\u201d blueprint making Mac 10 loadout even more OP ActivisionCall of Duty: Warzone has been accused of being pay-to-win after the Gallantry blueprint for the Mac 10, which is a part of the battle pass, is seemingly stronger than the base weapon. Just like every other successful battle royale on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34381"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34381\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}