{"id":41838,"date":"2025-01-28T16:37:04","date_gmt":"2025-01-28T16:37:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/diablo-fans-slam-diablo-4-itemization-we-dont-need-a-diablo-3-repeat-dexerto\/"},"modified":"2025-01-28T16:37:04","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T16:37:04","slug":"diablo-fans-slam-diablo-4-itemization-we-dont-need-a-diablo-3-repeat-dexerto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/diablo-fans-slam-diablo-4-itemization-we-dont-need-a-diablo-3-repeat-dexerto\/","title":{"rendered":"Diablo fans slam Diablo 4 itemization: \u201cWe don\u2019t need a Diablo 3 repeat\u201d &#8211; Dexerto"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Diablo fans slam Diablo 4 itemization: \u201cWe don\u2019t need a Diablo 3 repeat\u201d Blizzard EntertainmentDiablo 4\u2019s Quarterly Updates remain fans\u2019 only window into the game\u2019s development, but December\u2019s installment on itemization has left fans unimpressed. When it comes to Diablo 4, the next chapter in Blizzard\u2019s frightfully thrilling franchise, we\u2019ve heard very little \u2013 other than that it has been delayed. Controversial gameplay showcases have slipped through the cracks, and four of the five classes have been announced, but other than that the game has firmly tucked itself away amid the shadows. Blizzard\u2019s Quarterly Updates are the only glimpses we\u2019ve caught into how development has progressed, and December\u2019s highly anticipated post on itemization has left fans reeling. Diablo 4 itemization isn\u2019t a hit Taking a deep dive into the game\u2019s itemization, Diablo 4\u2019s \u201c+Skill Rank affixes\u201d have been particularly divisive. Affixes are added in the form of prefixes or suffixes to items, granting them extra buffs in Diablo 3. So, for example, the \u201cof Demon Slaying\u201d suffix applies (5-9)% additional damage to demons when added at the end of an item\u2019s name. In Diablo 4, players will also be able to try out new skills with these same affixes, allowing them to determine whether or not they\u2019ll want to add it to their character\u2019s arsenal. Diablo 3\u2019s affix system was controversial the first time around, with players finding the percentages and huge numbers particularly difficult to work with \u2013 turns out that sentiments remain the same. \u201cWhy again with the big numbers?\u201d asks one angry fan. \u201cWhy can\u2019t there be meaningful bonus increases that go from 1-10%, and the final damage numbers are not in thousands and millions?\u201d They conclude with a scathing \u201cplease, we don\u2019t need another Diablo 3 repeat!\u201d \u201cFeels like in a year they took a step back on itemization and decide to follow the \u2018Diablo 3\u2019 itemization philosophy (along with big numbers and crazy multipliers)\u201d fumes another. A final comment asks \u201cwhy on earth is a strong Axe also a strong spell caster weapon?\u201d noting that \u201cI played Diablo 3 on launch and a big turn off for me on first sight was that your 700 dps weapon on your Barbarian\u2019s attack is also 700 dps for you Wizard\u2019s spell.\u201d Calling it a \u201cbig mistake,\u201d their thoughts are pretty apparent. Whether or not this feedback will influence Blizzard to amend their affix system remains to be seen, however as Diablo 4\u2019s development progresses, it\u2019ll have to be good to win over OG fans.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Diablo fans slam Diablo 4 itemization: \u201cWe don\u2019t need a Diablo 3 repeat\u201d Blizzard EntertainmentDiablo 4\u2019s Quarterly Updates remain fans\u2019 only window into the game\u2019s development, but December\u2019s installment on itemization has left fans unimpressed. When it comes to Diablo 4, the next chapter in Blizzard\u2019s frightfully thrilling franchise, we\u2019ve heard very little \u2013 other [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41838","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41838","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41838"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41838\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41838"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41838"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41838"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}