{"id":42220,"date":"2025-01-28T16:39:48","date_gmt":"2025-01-28T16:39:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/genius-disney-dreamlight-valley-idea-would-fix-frustrating-player-homes-dexerto\/"},"modified":"2025-01-28T16:39:48","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T16:39:48","slug":"genius-disney-dreamlight-valley-idea-would-fix-frustrating-player-homes-dexerto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/genius-disney-dreamlight-valley-idea-would-fix-frustrating-player-homes-dexerto\/","title":{"rendered":"Genius Disney Dreamlight Valley idea would fix \u201cfrustrating\u201d player homes &#8211; Dexerto"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Genius Disney Dreamlight Valley idea would fix \u201cfrustrating\u201d player homes Disney \/ GameloftDisney Dreamlight Valley may thrive in its cooking, collecting, and quests, but its decorating is a major point of contention, more specifically, the use of player homes. As of the most recent update, there are now 33 characters residing in Disney Dreamlight Valley, and a vast majority of them have their own houses, from ice palaces to floating sea caves. Naturally, some fit into certain biomes perfectly, but others can feel like a bit of a stretch. As such, players find themselves having to make room for tons of large-scale homes, while still working to make their Valley look pretty. With that in mind, one Disney Dreamlight Valley player suggested a major overhaul for such homes and it could just make decorating the most enjoyable aspect of the cozy game. \u201cLet us use player house skins on villager houses too\u201d shared the player on the game\u2019s dedicated subreddit, going on to explain that the idea could solve \u201cbuilding bloat,\u201d having too many mandatory buildings in such a small space. \u201cPlease let me reskin villager houses the way I can skin my player house\u201d they continued. Doing so could allow players the chance to decorate the homes around their own designs, and could promote more purchases of the house skins in the premium shop, causing incentives for Gameloft and for players. Fans were instantly thrilled with the suggestion, with many wishing for it to be implemented, commenting, \u201cThis is a great idea\u201d and calling for Gameloft to add the proposed changes. The aesthetics weren\u2019t the only frustration among the community, with plenty calling for the size of the homes to be rescaled: \u201cThat\u2019s a good idea, or at least make them a consistent size, Mirabels is huge! And she\u2019s got a teeny tiny room, at least with FGM, she\u2019s got a little pumpkin cottage, and a little room.\u201d However, not all players were convinced, with some pointing out why the homes are their current design: \u201cI get why they don\u2019t and probably never will which is that the houses are meant to reflect the owners rather than being cookie-cutter\u2026these are iconic Disney characters with at least some of their homes based around iconic Disney imagery. The most I could see them doing is giving us alternative skins.\u201d Ultimately, being able to change the size and design of the homes in Disney Dreamlight Valley would be ideal for many players. It would allow us the chance to decorate how we want to, or even design based around a certain house skin. While it would certainly be tricky for Gameloft to implement, if we\u2019ve seen anything from Premium Shops, Star Paths, and updates, the developers are always listening to new ideas from the playerbase.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Genius Disney Dreamlight Valley idea would fix \u201cfrustrating\u201d player homes Disney \/ GameloftDisney Dreamlight Valley may thrive in its cooking, collecting, and quests, but its decorating is a major point of contention, more specifically, the use of player homes. As of the most recent update, there are now 33 characters residing in Disney Dreamlight Valley, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42220","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42220","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42220"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42220\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42220"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42220"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}