{"id":45195,"date":"2025-01-28T17:01:36","date_gmt":"2025-01-28T17:01:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/bride-and-grooms-outlandish-wedding-rules-go-viral-there-will-be-twerking-dexerto\/"},"modified":"2025-01-28T17:01:36","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T17:01:36","slug":"bride-and-grooms-outlandish-wedding-rules-go-viral-there-will-be-twerking-dexerto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/bride-and-grooms-outlandish-wedding-rules-go-viral-there-will-be-twerking-dexerto\/","title":{"rendered":"Bride and groom\u2019s outlandish wedding rules go viral: \u201cThere will be twerking\u201d &#8211; Dexerto"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bride and groom\u2019s outlandish wedding rules go viral: \u201cThere will be twerking\u201d Unsplash: Jeremy Wong WeddingsA bride and groom have gone viral for their \u201ccondescending\u201d wedding rules after being exposed on Reddit by a disgruntled guest. Labeling the couple as a \u201cbridezilla\u201d and \u201cgroomzilla\u201d respectively, the original poster \u2018VieleAud\u2018 shared a set of 15 rules guests were expected to uphold. \u201cIf someone sent this to me I would simply just not go,\u201d they captioned the Reddit thread, with more than 4,600 upvotes showing that users of the platform evidently agreed. The couple \u2014 whose names were redacted from the list of rules to protect their identities \u2014 have since been slammed in the comments and dubbed \u201ca*******.\u201d However, it is not the rules themselves that have users riled up, but the \u201centitled\u201d and \u201ccondescending\u201d phrasing. The rules included: reminding guests that it is the couple\u2019s \u201cbig day, not yours;\u201d ordering invitees to stay out of the photographer\u2019s way; the dress code is strictly black and gold; and the seating chart is not to be rearranged. Rule five, in particular, rubbed some users the wrong way for its wording, reading, \u201cIf you didn\u2019t put out any money for the wedding, keep your should\u2019ve, could\u2019ve, would\u2019ve to yourself. Your opinion is irrelevant.\u201d The couple then went on to instruct guests to \u201cpace\u201d their drinking, make no big announcements or proposals, and \u201csimply go home\u201d if they didn\u2019t like the music; \u201cThis is a celebration, not a funeral.\u201d \u201cThis is a \u2018Taking over for the 99\u2032 [and] 2000\u2019s\u2019 type of event, so there will be twerking,\u201d rule nine continued, before a redacted hashtag was given for any photos posted online. Following the couple\u2019s rule on \u201ctwerking,\u201d guests were told to \u201cnot sit down all night\u201d and warned they would be \u201cescorted out\u201d if caught with liquor not supplied by the venue. The final three rules on the list were a reminder that it was the couple\u2019s big day and that the \u201cbride and groom said what they said,\u201d though this shouldn\u2019t stop invitees from turning \u201call the way up.\u201d \u201cYeah, the majority of these are basic wedding wisdom anyway,\u201d one Redditor pointed out, claiming the rules were \u201cjust phrased aggressively.\u201d A second person agreed that \u201cthese could be rewritten to not sound like an a******,\u201d with a third questioning \u201cWho are you inviting to your wedding that you have to tell them to not complain?\u201d When one commenter pointed out the couple\u2019s misspelling of \u201cirrelevant\u201d as \u201cirrelavent,\u201d another jokingly responded, \u201cPointing out typos is a flagrant violation of rule 5. Cousin Jack will be escorting you out. Leave your registry gift on the table.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bride and groom\u2019s outlandish wedding rules go viral: \u201cThere will be twerking\u201d Unsplash: Jeremy Wong WeddingsA bride and groom have gone viral for their \u201ccondescending\u201d wedding rules after being exposed on Reddit by a disgruntled guest. Labeling the couple as a \u201cbridezilla\u201d and \u201cgroomzilla\u201d respectively, the original poster \u2018VieleAud\u2018 shared a set of 15 rules [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45195","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45195","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45195"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45195\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45195"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45195"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45195"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}