{"id":57009,"date":"2025-01-28T18:38:42","date_gmt":"2025-01-28T18:38:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/overwatch-streamer-hits-back-at-twitch-after-lingerie-stream-warning-dexerto\/"},"modified":"2025-01-28T18:38:42","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T18:38:42","slug":"overwatch-streamer-hits-back-at-twitch-after-lingerie-stream-warning-dexerto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/overwatch-streamer-hits-back-at-twitch-after-lingerie-stream-warning-dexerto\/","title":{"rendered":"Overwatch streamer hits back at Twitch after \u201clingerie\u201d stream warning &#8211; Dexerto"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Overwatch streamer hits back at Twitch after \u201clingerie\u201d stream warning Twitter: @AskFareeha \/ TwitchPopular Overwatch streamer Fareeha Andersen hit back at Twitch after receiving a warning for violating Twitch\u2019s Community Guidelines by hosting a \u201clingerie\u201d stream. Twitch partner and popular Overwatch streamer Fareeha was not too happy she was given a warning for violating the Community Guidelines on the streaming platform. The DPS main argued against the warning\u2019s claim that she was wearing lingerie on Twitter and re-sparked the debate with how the streaming platform enforces its rules, particularly with the clothing guidelines. Warned for wearing \u201clingerie\u201d The Overwatch streamer posted a screenshot of an email she received from Twitch on Twitter on September 14, which said she was \u201crecently reported for breaking Twitch Community Guidelines\u201d and it listed \u201cunderwear\u201d and \u201clingerie\u201d as the reason. The email then informed her that the VODs that were reported had been deleted to \u201cavoid further reports\u201d and then said that she would be on a probation period for the next 90 days. The Gen.G streamer is not allowed to be a part of promotional activities until it is lifted. Fareeha decided to hit back at the streaming platform and tweeted \u201cBecause workout clothes and showing midriff=lingerie\u201d and uploaded a picture of the clothes she was wearing that was considered so risque that it violated the guidelines. Because workout clothes and showing midriff=lingerie ok ok ok cool cool cool pic.twitter.com\/KNSCinmMIP \u2014 Fareeha Gen.G (@AskFareeha) September 14, 2019 The Overwatch streamer followed up by saying that she doesn\u2019t \u201ceven own lingerie\u201d and that all she has is \u201cgiant ass sports bras\u201d which doesn\u2019t show off any cleavage, before cracking a joke: \u201cAs if I had any LOL.\u201d i don\u2019t even own lingerie, all i have are giant ass sports bras that i wear as shirts, they don\u2019t even show an ounce of cleavage (as if i had any LOL) \u2014 Fareeha Gen.G (@AskFareeha) September 14, 2019 She then argued that the warning didn\u2019t make much sense, given that not only do her clothes not show much skin, but that her on stream camera is \u201calways shoulders and up.\u201d Read More: xQc and Trainwrecks argue over Amouranth\u2019s Twitch ban Fareeha then made the observation that you \u201ccan see more t*t\u201d just by going outside and walking among the general public. my on stream camera is quite literally ALWAYS shoulders and up, you can see more tit just from going out on the streets \u2014 Fareeha Gen.G (@AskFareeha) September 14, 2019 While it\u2019s unclear if she was mass reported by trolls, the Twitch personality is currently on probation as of the time of this article. Fareeha is a popular Overwatch streamer for Gen.G Esports, and boasts almost 70,000 followers on the platform as of September 14.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Overwatch streamer hits back at Twitch after \u201clingerie\u201d stream warning Twitter: @AskFareeha \/ TwitchPopular Overwatch streamer Fareeha Andersen hit back at Twitch after receiving a warning for violating Twitch\u2019s Community Guidelines by hosting a \u201clingerie\u201d stream. Twitch partner and popular Overwatch streamer Fareeha was not too happy she was given a warning for violating the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57009","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57009","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57009"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57009\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57009"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57009"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57009"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}