{"id":60993,"date":"2025-01-28T19:16:09","date_gmt":"2025-01-28T19:16:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/tiktoker-claims-she-was-offered-70k-a-week-to-clone-her-for-ai-content-dexerto\/"},"modified":"2025-01-28T19:16:09","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T19:16:09","slug":"tiktoker-claims-she-was-offered-70k-a-week-to-clone-her-for-ai-content-dexerto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/tiktoker-claims-she-was-offered-70k-a-week-to-clone-her-for-ai-content-dexerto\/","title":{"rendered":"TikToker claims she was offered $70k a week to \u201cclone\u201d her for AI content &#8211; Dexerto"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>TikToker claims she was offered $70k a week to \u201cclone\u201d her for AI content SimplyNessa\/TikTok, Xu Haiwei\/UnsplashA TikTok user has claimed that a company offered to pay her $70,000 per week if she would let them \u201cclone\u201d her to create AI content. The use of AI has skyrocketed in recent years, with more and more people finding out of they can use it in their daily lives. Influencers and internet stars have realized how they can profit from it by making AI copies of themselves to communicate with fans. One AI model even went viral, despite not being a real person. TikToker imsimplynessa, who has 171,700 followers on the app, made a video where she explained how she\u2019d been approached by a company to create a \u201cclone\u201d of herself that would create AI content for her followers. \u201cEpisode 1,000 of the weirdest and scariest sh*t that happens in my life,\u201d Nessa started. \u201cI just had a company reach out and want to clone me. This is not a joke, this literally just f**king happened. So last week I got an email from a brand and they said hey we work with other influencers that have over a million followers and we recreate them as an AI program.\u201d The TikToker goes on to say that the company framed their offer as a wholesome way for her followers to interact with her in a different capacity and that she\u2019d get to make some good money in the process. She said: \u201cAnd they were pitching it as if oh we would love to create an AI version of you so your subscribers can talk to you, ask you for advice, go to you for you know random story times. \u201cAnd you would send us 30 videos of you spinning around looking into different directions so we could recreate, you know, an AI version of you. And they told me that I could make $70,000 in one week.\u201d \u201cNot all money is good money\u201d Thinking the offer sounded too good to be true, Nessa decided to look more into the company that had contacted her. \u201cThat doesn\u2019t sound right. When I say not all money is good money, let me share with you guys what I found,\u201d she said. \u201cSo first after doing a little bit of research on this company, they actually recently had a scandal with one of their influencers. That AI they\u2019re claiming would be sharing story times and giving advice, somebody paid this girl\u2019s AI to say the most grossest, like raunchiest, nastiest sh*t.\u201d When she later gets a follow-up email, asking if she\u2019s interested, the company goes on to name a few names of influencers they\u2019re working with. This leads Nessa to go onto Telegram to explore the AI technology more. She explained: \u201cI download Telegram and I click on the link to go ahead and talk to one of these girls\u2019 A.I.s, and immediately it asks me \u2018what is your sickest, twisted fantasy, let\u2019s recreate it.\u2019 So this company is telling me oh we\u2019re gonna use it for story times and talking to the girls. No b**ch, they want to use you to sell disgusting content without your consent.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>TikToker claims she was offered $70k a week to \u201cclone\u201d her for AI content SimplyNessa\/TikTok, Xu Haiwei\/UnsplashA TikTok user has claimed that a company offered to pay her $70,000 per week if she would let them \u201cclone\u201d her to create AI content. The use of AI has skyrocketed in recent years, with more and more [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60993","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60993","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60993"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60993\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60993"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60993"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60993"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}