Woman sparks outrage for saying \u201cnatural bodies are for poor females\u201d Unsplash.com: Zoran Zonde StojanovskiA woman is sparking backlash after posting a viral tweet claiming \u201cnatural bodies are for poor females,\u201d creating a major debate about plastic surgery, mental health, and self-esteem. In this day and age of social media, increasingly unattainable beauty standards and their effects on people\u2019s self-esteem have become major topics of conversation across the web. With many users opting for apps like FaceTune or Instagram filters to enhance their appearance,images of perfectly-contoured faces and curvy figures often fill up one\u2019s timeline. Now, another major topic has been tossed into the discussion, thanks to a Twitter user named \u2018Goated Throated.\u2019 (No, we\u2019re not making that up.) Back in January, \u2018Goated Throated\u2019 posted a tweet where she claimed that \u201cnatural bodies are for poor females.\u201d She followed up her post by doubling down on her statement, saying, \u201cI said what I said,\u201d and adding, \u201cY\u2019all mad as f*ck.\u201d That being said, she did agree to a reply to her tweet saying \u201cnatural bodies look better\u201d\u2014 but her post has struck a chord on the internet, anyway. Woman sparks debate after claiming \u201cnatural bodies are for poor females\u201d Her post has struck up quite a conversation. Many users agreed that modern beauty standards are held behind a kind of paywall. To achieve Kim Kardashian\u2019s hourglass figure, one might need to hit up their plastic surgeon for a breast augmentation and a Brazilian Butt Lift (BBL), which can cost thousands of dollars and are some of the most dangerous cosmetic surgeries out there. \u201cAnd BBL\u2019s are for girls with low self esteem \u2019cause they wasn\u2019t born blessed,\u201d one user shot back. And Bbl\u2019s are for girls w low self esteem cuz they wasn\u2019t born blessed \ud83e\udd23\ud83e\udd23\ud83e\udd23\ud83e\udd23 \u2014 CiaraMonay\u00e8 (@ieatprettychics) January 26, 2023 \u201cIs it hard to believe that some people like their natural body?\u201d another wrote. \u201cEverybody doesn\u2019t want to look the same!\u201d Is it hard to believe that some people like their natural body?? Everybody doesn\u2019t want to look the same! \u2014 \ud83e\udd0eA Pony Not a Stallion\ud83c\uddef\ud83c\uddf2 (@ChristyCindy) January 27, 2023 \u201cNatural bodies are for women who love themselves and have self-confidence,\u201d yet another said. \u201cThey don\u2019t let society dictate how they should look. Don\u2019t project your self-hate and lack of self-love on others. Much love to all of those who love themselves how you are.\u201d Natural bodies are for women who love themselves and have self confidence. They don\u2019t let society dictate how they should look. Don\u2019t project your self hate and lack of self love on others. Much love to all of those who love themselves how you are \u2014 MrSagittarius (@BaldNTatted76) January 27, 2023 This is far from the first time the internet has hit back at unrealistic beauty standards; in fact, TikTok\u2019s \u2018Bold Glamour\u2019 filter came under fire from a swath of users who accused it of \u201cmessing with people\u2019s body dysmorphia\u201d due to its highly realistic nature.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Woman sparks outrage for saying \u201cnatural bodies are for poor females\u201d Unsplash.com: Zoran Zonde StojanovskiA woman is sparking backlash after posting a viral tweet claiming \u201cnatural bodies are for poor females,\u201d creating a major debate about plastic surgery, mental health, and self-esteem. In this day and age of social media, increasingly unattainable beauty standards and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64904","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64904","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64904"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64904\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64904"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64904"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64904"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}