{"id":65163,"date":"2025-01-28T19:55:57","date_gmt":"2025-01-28T19:55:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/xqc-criticizes-39daph-for-leaking-pokimane-dms-in-confusing-drama-dexerto\/"},"modified":"2025-01-28T19:55:57","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T19:55:57","slug":"xqc-criticizes-39daph-for-leaking-pokimane-dms-in-confusing-drama-dexerto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/2025\/01\/28\/xqc-criticizes-39daph-for-leaking-pokimane-dms-in-confusing-drama-dexerto\/","title":{"rendered":"xQc criticizes 39daph for leaking Pokimane DMs in \u201cconfusing\u201d drama &#8211; Dexerto"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>xQc criticizes 39daph for leaking Pokimane DMs in \u201cconfusing\u201d drama Top Twitch streamer Felix \u2018xQc\u2019 Lengyel has reacted to the ongoing drama between fellow streamers 39daph and Pokimane, critical of both daph and the community\u2019s reaction. On Sunday, November 17, 39daph revealed that Pokimane had privately messaged her, inquiring as to why she had unfollowed her on Twitter. Daph explained that she simply \u201cdoesn\u2019t watch [Pokimane\u2019s] stuff\u201d. This reveal from daph sparked a drama on social media, which eventually reached xQc, who \u2013 at the request of his viewers \u2013 weighed in on the situation. After watching 39daph\u2019s initial clip, Lengyel said he was \u201cconfused\u201d and was particularly critical of her decision to expose private messages shared between the two streamers. \u201cI like to hate on everyone, just as much as the next person\u201d, xQc explains, \u201cbut, since when is leaking DMs ok? Is it ok depending on who it is? I don\u2019t get it.\u201d He continues, questioning daph\u2019s decision: \u201cWhy leak DMs? That\u2019s just kind of f**ked up. I have this golden rule: you just don\u2019t leak DMs. You just don\u2019t do that.\u201d xQc concludes that Pokimane\u2019s message would have been \u201cformatted\u201d differently if it was intended to be seen by the public, rather than just one individual. After watching further clips surrounding the drama, most of which had gained traction on the popular LiveStream Fails subreddit, xQc was also critical of the community\u2019s response. Read more: PewDiePie reveals plan if YouTube failed &#8211; \u201cI\u2019m so confused with LiveStream Fails!\u201d he exclaimed. \u201cOne person, unfollows Pokimane, and Poki\u2019s wrong. Poki unfollows him, and she\u2019s wrong. What the f**k?! She\u2019s wrong in every case then?\u201d xQc and Pokimane\u2019s channels are both of similar levels of popularity on the platform, and so he went on to attempt to rationalize her response to the situation. \u201cWhen you\u2019re in drama, when you\u2019re under fire, sometimes you\u2019re insecure about what you do,\u201d xQc began, \u201cEvery streamer has [their] highs and downs, and Pokimane has been under fire ever since her subtweet or whatever \u2013 yeah, it was deserved. \u201cBut, my take, is she was probably insecure about everything, and somebody who she maybe saw as a peer, and she just asked, just to know, \u2018is my sh*t trash now? Can I fix it? I lost confidence, I want to know the problem so I can fix it.\u2019 I think that\u2019s fine.\u201d Pokimane discussed the confrontation on stream, showing the DMs and confirming that what 39daph had claimed was said was accurate. The pair will likely be hoping that the drama has now concluded and both streamers and the community can move on.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>xQc criticizes 39daph for leaking Pokimane DMs in \u201cconfusing\u201d drama Top Twitch streamer Felix \u2018xQc\u2019 Lengyel has reacted to the ongoing drama between fellow streamers 39daph and Pokimane, critical of both daph and the community\u2019s reaction. On Sunday, November 17, 39daph revealed that Pokimane had privately messaged her, inquiring as to why she had unfollowed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65163","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65163","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65163"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65163\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65163"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65163"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dejan.au\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65163"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}